↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

GM‐CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor) supplementation in culture media for women undergoing assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
GM‐CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor) supplementation in culture media for women undergoing assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013497.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Armstrong, Jeanette MacKenzie, Bryan Woodward, Allan Pacey, Cindy Farquhar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 68 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 75 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,202,883
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,577
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,503
of 430,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.