| Title |
Nutritional interventions for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011378.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zena EH Moore, Meave A Corcoran, Declan Patton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Ireland | 4 | 10% |
| South Africa | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Bahrain | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 291 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Researcher | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 20% |
| Unknown | 115 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 131 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,300,114
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,842
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,227
of 371,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.