The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Pharmacological interventions for clozapine‐induced sinus tachycardia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011566.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Lally, Mary J Docherty, James H MacCabe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,576,899
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,034
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,959
of 360,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.