The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005542.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane Farrar, Derek J Tuffnell, Jane West, Helen M West |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 656 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 15% |
| Researcher | 72 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 112 | 17% |
| Unknown | 231 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 182 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 11% |
| Psychology | 44 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 72 | 11% |
| Unknown | 252 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,533,133
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,155
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,006
of 358,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.