↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
647 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005542.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane Farrar, Derek J Tuffnell, Jane West, Helen M West

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 647 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 643 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 16%
Researcher 74 11%
Student > Bachelor 57 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 9%
Student > Postgraduate 32 5%
Other 104 16%
Unknown 222 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 181 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 11%
Psychology 45 7%
Social Sciences 23 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 2%
Other 68 11%
Unknown 243 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,533,133
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,155
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,006
of 358,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.