↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
48 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2535 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah Ivers, Gro Jamtvedt, Signe Flottorp, Jane M Young, Jan Odgaard‐Jensen, Simon D French, Mary Ann O'Brien, Marit Johansen, Jeremy Grimshaw, Andrew D Oxman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 16 <1%
United States 12 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 2057 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 353 17%
Researcher 288 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 232 11%
Student > Bachelor 170 8%
Other 139 7%
Other 493 23%
Unknown 446 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 761 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 253 12%
Social Sciences 124 6%
Psychology 106 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 51 2%
Other 281 13%
Unknown 545 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#558,110
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#978
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,662
of 181,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.