↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Chooi, Julia J Cox, Richard S Lumb, Philippa Middleton, Mark Chemali, Richard S Emmett, Scott W Simmons, Allan M Cyna

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 268 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 8%
Other 22 8%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 89 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 102 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,045,195
of 18,659,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,317
of 11,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,356
of 304,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,659,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.