↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Chooi, Julia J Cox, Richard S Lumb, Philippa Middleton, Mark Chemali, Richard S Emmett, Scott W Simmons, Allan M Cyna

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 345 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 24 7%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 136 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 152 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,331,911
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,780
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,757
of 432,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.