↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
173 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013031.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth K Chan, Daniel A Joo, Andrew D McRae, Yemisi Takwoingi, Zahra A Premji, Eddy Lang, Abel Wakai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#240,282
of 19,039,850 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#474
of 11,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,498
of 305,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,039,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.