↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
189 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013031.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth K Chan, Daniel A Joo, Andrew D McRae, Yemisi Takwoingi, Zahra A Premji, Eddy Lang, Abel Wakai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 189 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Other 18 8%
Student > Master 17 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 102 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 110 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#327,784
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#537
of 13,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,009
of 432,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.