↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
201 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Chest ultrasonography versus supine chest radiography for diagnosis of pneumothorax in trauma patients in the emergency department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013031.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth K Chan, Daniel A Joo, Andrew D McRae, Yemisi Takwoingi, Zahra A Premji, Eddy Lang, Abel Wakai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 201 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Other 17 7%
Student > Master 17 7%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 99 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 107 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#301,396
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#508
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,447
of 430,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.