The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004993.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Lethaby, Asima Mukhopadhyay, Raj Naik |
Abstract |
Hysterectomy using an abdominal approach removes either the uterus alone (subtotal hysterectomy) or both the uterus and the cervix (total hysterectomy). The latter is more common but the outcomes have not been systematically compared. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
Researcher | 20 | 11% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#243,499
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#408
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,002
of 175,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.