↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006761.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon W Nienhuijs, Ignace HJT de Hingh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 48 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,306
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.