↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004345.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund Bailey, Wafa Kashbour, Neha Shah, Helen V Worthington, Tara F Renton, Paul Coulthard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 30 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,115,966
of 17,630,293 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,881
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,761
of 301,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,630,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.