↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early fortification of human milk versus late fortification to promote growth in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Early fortification of human milk versus late fortification to promote growth in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013392.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivam Thanigainathan, Thangaraj Abiramalatha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 18%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,634,188
of 17,483,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,049
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,558
of 301,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,483,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.