↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early fortification of human milk versus late fortification to promote growth in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Early fortification of human milk versus late fortification to promote growth in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013392.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivam Thanigainathan, Thangaraj Abiramalatha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Researcher 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 101 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 113 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,056,031
of 26,191,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,211
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,594
of 430,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,191,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.