↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Kreuzberger, Johanna AAG Damen, Marialena Trivella, Lise J Estcourt, Angela Aldin, Lisa Umlauff, Maria DLA Vazquez-Montes, Robert Wolff, Karel GM Moons, Ina Monsef, Farid Foroutan, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Nicole Skoetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Philosophy 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,240,873
of 16,983,585 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,909
of 11,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,266
of 300,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,983,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.