↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise interventions for upper-limb dysfunction due to breast cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Exercise interventions for upper-limb dysfunction due to breast cancer treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005211.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret L McNeely, Kristin Campbell, Maria Ospina, Brian H Rowe, Kelly Dabbs, Terry P Klassen, John Mackey, Kerry Courneya

Abstract

Upper-limb dysfunction is a commonly reported side effect of treatment for breast cancer and may include decreased shoulder range of motion (the range through which a joint can be moved) (ROM) and strength, pain and lymphedema.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 323 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 19%
Student > Master 61 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 13%
Researcher 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 55 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 22%
Sports and Recreations 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 65 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,137,899
of 16,292,334 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,066
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,250
of 129,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,292,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.