↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005276.pub4
Authors

Neda Minakaran, Daniel G Ezra, Bruce DS Allan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Psychology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,178,687
of 17,719,454 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,024
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,479
of 302,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,719,454 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.