↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Topical anaesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine versus topical anaesthesia alone for phacoemulsification cataract surgery in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005276.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neda Minakaran, Daniel G Ezra, Bruce DS Allan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 28 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,568,264
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,578
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,801
of 398,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.