| Title |
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004398.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anik Giguère, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Claude Bernard Uwizeye, France Légaré, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, David U Auguste, José Massougbodji |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 490 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 7% |
| Researcher | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 18% |
| Unknown | 184 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Psychology | 14 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 195 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,196,534
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,666
of 12,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,277
of 400,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.