↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
Title
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004398.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anik Giguère, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Claude Bernard Uwizeye, France Légaré, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, David U Auguste, José Massougbodji

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 246 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 17 7%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 49 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 54 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,437,820
of 17,383,690 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,631
of 11,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,860
of 302,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,383,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.