↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004084.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Ge, Rodrigo Cavallazzi, Chunbo Li, Shu Ming Pan, Ying‐Wei Wang, Fei‐Long Wang

Abstract

Central venous access (CVA) is widely used. However, its thrombotic, stenotic and infectious complications can be life-threatening and involve high-cost therapy. Research revealed that the risk of catheter-related complications varied according to the site of CVA. It would be helpful to find the preferred site of insertion to minimize the risk of catheter-related complications. This review was originally published in 2007 and was updated in 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 361 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Other 34 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Other 96 26%
Unknown 81 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 192 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Psychology 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 93 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,300,917
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,785
of 12,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,678
of 168,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.