↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Wang, Jichang Luo, Xue Wang, Kun Yang, Vikram Jadhav, Peng Gao, Yan Ma, Na Zhao, Liqun Jiao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 41 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 48 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,794,938
of 21,301,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,491
of 12,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,429
of 313,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,301,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.