The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013267.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tao Wang, Jichang Luo, Xue Wang, Kun Yang, Vikram Jadhav, Peng Gao, Yan Ma, Na Zhao, Liqun Jiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,978,563
of 26,103,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,207
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,494
of 429,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,103,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.