↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoietin plus iron versus control treatment including placebo or iron for preoperative anaemic adults undergoing non‐cardiac surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Erythropoietin plus iron versus control treatment including placebo or iron for preoperative anaemic adults undergoing non‐cardiac surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012451.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lutz Kaufner, Christian von Heymann, Anne Henkelmann, Nathan L Pace, Stephanie Weibel, Peter Kranke, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ravi Gill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 256 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 15 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 119 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 125 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,746,648
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,607
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,784
of 427,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.