↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Erythropoietin plus iron versus control treatment including placebo or iron for preoperative anaemic adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Erythropoietin plus iron versus control treatment including placebo or iron for preoperative anaemic adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012451.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lutz Kaufner, Christian von Heymann, Anne Henkelmann, Nathan L Pace, Stephanie Weibel, Peter Kranke, Joerg J Meerpohl, Ravi Gill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Unspecified 11 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 56 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Unspecified 12 8%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 59 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,377,480
of 21,790,947 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,240
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,081
of 314,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,790,947 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.