| Title |
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013680 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa J Palmer, Nicholas Henschke, Gemma Villanueva, Nicola Maayan, Hanna Bergman, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Marita S Fønhus, Tigest Tamrat, Garrett L Mehl, Caroline Free |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 362 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 15% |
| Unknown | 152 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 11% |
| Psychology | 26 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 169 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#648,151
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,227
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,080
of 402,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.