↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
243 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
592 Mendeley
Title
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Theresa Hm Moore, Lisa Parker, Timothy Chambers, Alice Grady, Kellia Chiu, Matthew Parry, Magdalena Wilczynska, Ella Flemyng, Lisa Bero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 243 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 592 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 13%
Researcher 61 10%
Student > Bachelor 57 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 6%
Other 27 5%
Other 93 16%
Unknown 245 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 8%
Social Sciences 34 6%
Computer Science 28 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 3%
Other 101 17%
Unknown 264 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#169,276
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#295
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,325
of 427,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.