↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007352.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Hardman, Neil Sharma, Joel Smith, Paul Nankivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 35 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,817
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,109
of 384,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.