↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007352.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Hardman, Neil Sharma, Joel Smith, Paul Nankivell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Unspecified 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 62 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Unspecified 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 68 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,399,653
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,025
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,384
of 421,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.