↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Feather versus non-feather bedding for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Feather versus non-feather bedding for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002154
Authors

Fiona Campbell, Peter G Gibson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 39 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 40 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,976,202
of 16,339,229 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,535
of 11,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,048
of 266,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,339,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.