↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Modes of exercise training for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Modes of exercise training for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009638.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra CP Jansen, Ukachukwu Okoroafor Abaraogu, Gert Jan Lauret, Farzin Fakhry, Hugo JP Fokkenrood, Joep AW Teijink

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Sports and Recreations 8 12%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#459,254
of 17,997,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,014
of 11,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,265
of 306,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,997,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.