↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002845.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley J Denison, Julia Worswick, Christine M Bond, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Alain Mayhew, Shakila Gnani Ramadoss, Clare Robertson, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Margaret C Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,117,561
of 18,888,807 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,796
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,441
of 309,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,888,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.