↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral versus intra‐vaginal imidazole and triazole anti‐fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Oral versus intra‐vaginal imidazole and triazole anti‐fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002845.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley J Denison, Julia Worswick, Christine M Bond, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Alain Mayhew, Shakila Gnani Ramadoss, Clare Robertson, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Margaret C Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Master 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 87 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 92 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#930,248
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,765
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,510
of 427,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.