↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002845.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley J Denison, Julia Worswick, Christine M Bond, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Alain Mayhew, Shakila Gnani Ramadoss, Clare Robertson, Mary Ellen Schaafsma, Margaret C Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 57 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 61 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#824,550
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,750
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,319
of 397,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.