↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007372.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian ML Gyte, Vicky Nogueira Pileggi, Rachel Plachcinski, Alfred O Osoti, Elaine M Finucane

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Unspecified 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 18%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#848,451
of 17,043,172 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,247
of 11,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,828
of 305,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,043,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.