↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007372.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian ML Gyte, Vicky Nogueira Pileggi, Rachel Plachcinski, Alfred O Osoti, Elaine M Finucane

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 56 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Unspecified 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 60 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,191,339
of 21,714,585 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,806
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,680
of 317,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,714,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.