↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007372.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zarko Alfirevic, Gillian Ml Gyte, Vicky Nogueira Pileggi, Rachel Plachcinski, Alfred O Osoti, Elaine M Finucane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Unspecified 15 6%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 101 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Unspecified 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 108 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,711,723
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,671
of 11,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,616
of 423,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.