↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
493 Mendeley
Title
Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000012.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen D Hodnett, Soo Downe, Denis Walsh

Abstract

Alternative institutional settings have been established for the care of pregnant women who prefer little or no medical intervention. The settings may offer care throughout pregnancy and birth, or only during labour; they may be part of hospitals or freestanding entities. Specially designed labour rooms include bedroom-like rooms, ambient rooms, and Snoezelen rooms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 493 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 482 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 16%
Student > Master 69 14%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 8%
Lecturer 34 7%
Other 105 21%
Unknown 117 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 138 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 118 24%
Social Sciences 37 8%
Psychology 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 131 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,028,378
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,043
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,621
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.