Title |
Nutritional interventions for liver-transplanted patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007605.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gero Langer, Katja Großmann, Steffen Fleischer, Almuth Berg, Dirk Grothues, Andreas Wienke, Johann Behrens, Astrid Fink |
Abstract |
Malnutrition is a common problem for patients waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation and a risk factor for post-transplant morbidity. The decision to initiate enteral or parenteral nutrition, to which patients and at which time, is still debated. The effects of nutritional supplements given before or after liver transplantation, or both, still remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 16% |
Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 17% |
Unknown | 64 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 8% |
Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,242,608
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,949
of 12,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,514
of 170,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.