↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional support for acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nutritional support for acute kidney injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005426.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Li, Xi Tang, Juqian Zhang, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Treatment for acute kidney Injury (AKI) primarily relies on treating the underlying cause and maintaining the patient until kidney function has recovered. Enteral and parenteral nutrition are commonly used to treat nutritional disorders in AKI patients, however their efficacy in treating AKI are still debated. This review was first published in 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Professor 9 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,136,453
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,630
of 13,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,352
of 177,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.