↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional support for acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nutritional support for acute kidney injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005426.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Li, Xi Tang, Juqian Zhang, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Treatment for acute kidney Injury (AKI) primarily relies on treating the underlying cause and maintaining the patient until kidney function has recovered. Enteral and parenteral nutrition are commonly used to treat nutritional disorders in AKI patients, however their efficacy in treating AKI are still debated. This review was first published in 2010.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Professor 9 6%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 29 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,975,947
of 19,187,958 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,554
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,897
of 142,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,187,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.