RT @drbretty: “Meta‐analysis of three trials (290 infants) did not show an effect on rates of GM‐IVH (RR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)…
RT @drbretty: “Meta‐analysis of three trials (290 infants) did not show an effect on rates of GM‐IVH (RR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)…
RT @drbretty: “Meta‐analysis of three trials (290 infants) did not show an effect on rates of GM‐IVH (RR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)…
“Meta‐analysis of three trials (290 infants) did not show an effect on rates of GM‐IVH (RR 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.56” https://t.co/cKgjYkDibL
@drbretty @mypsanz This fascinates me. As a practice it has taken off like nothing else but seems to be based on nothing! Any time I can find that it has been looked at shows no difference. https://t.co/y35fOxcGUE(VON,h%20after%20birth%20%5B12%5D. htt
@antehopkins @souvik_neo @BrianKingNeo @EBNEO @nicupodcast @canadianpreemie Pretty amenable to an RCT- no medicinal product, simple intervention. When it is looked at no difference found:https://t.co/y35fOxcGUE(VON,h%20after%20birth%20%5B12%5D. , https:/
RT @Dr_KS_Gautham: @padkaer @NICU_Musings Here is a link to the Cochrane review about head in midline position. 3 RCTs. One included bed ti…
@padkaer @NICU_Musings Here is a link to the Cochrane review about head in midline position. 3 RCTs. One included bed tilting, no difference in IVH rates. Lower mortality with midline position but certainty of evidence very low. #neotwitter https://t.co/NL
@NICU_Musings @NeoResearch_Net @jramonfernandez @KentWillisMD @neonatelee1 @proanoA Do we really have enough trial evidence to say midline positioning improves outcomes? Latest @CochraneNeonate evidence doesn't yet confirm or refute that https://t.co/vYTqK
#Position_médiane (centrale) de la #tête pour #prévenir les #hémorragies #intraventriculaires (c'est-à-dire les saignements dans le cerveau) chez les #nourrissons très grands #prématurés : https://t.co/LnOHT13ywE