↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew F Cumpstey, Alex H Oldman, Andrew F Smith, Daniel Martin, Michael PW Grocott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Master 18 13%
Other 14 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 43 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#676,404
of 17,590,133 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,688
of 11,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,636
of 306,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,590,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.