↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew F Cumpstey, Alex H Oldman, Andrew F Smith, Daniel Martin, Michael PW Grocott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 270 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Master 31 11%
Other 27 10%
Unspecified 17 6%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 86 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Unspecified 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 96 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#791,040
of 22,353,257 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,703
of 12,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,713
of 320,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,353,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.