↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
55 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
Title
Oxygen targets in the intensive care unit during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew F Cumpstey, Alex H Oldman, Andrew F Smith, Daniel Martin, Michael Pw Grocott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 285 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Other 31 11%
Student > Master 30 11%
Researcher 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 109 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 120 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,013,229
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,033
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,679
of 426,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.