↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ayurvedic herbal preparations for hypercholesterolaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Ayurvedic herbal preparations for hypercholesterolaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012076.pub2
Authors

Dinesh Gyawali, Robert H Schneider, David W Orme-Johnson, Sridharan Ramaratnam

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,615,649
of 21,200,954 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,310
of 12,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,824
of 316,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,200,954 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.