↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra A Zimpel, Maria Regina Torloni, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Ronald LG Flumignan, Edina MK da Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Psychology 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 35 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#811,787
of 17,939,704 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,039
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,126
of 308,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,939,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.