↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra A Zimpel, Maria Regina Torloni, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Ronald LG Flumignan, Edina MK da Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 248 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Master 23 9%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Other 14 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 112 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 15%
Psychology 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 119 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,046,584
of 22,491,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,378
of 12,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,518
of 320,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,491,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.