| Title |
Hyaluronic acid in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007421.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Devorah Heymann, Liat Vidal, Yuval Or, Zeev Shoham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#381,937
of 24,044,816 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#688
of 12,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,925
of 403,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,044,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.