| Title |
Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013544 |
| Authors |
Katherine Jones, Fiona Hawke, Jane Newman, James AL Miller, Joshua Burns, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Grainne Gorman, Douglass M Turnbull, Gita Ramdharry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
| Australia | 3 | 23% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 23 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,305,834
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,660
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,852
of 388,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.