↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nghia Nguyen, Bing Zhang, Stefan D Holubar, Darrell S Pardi, Siddharth Singh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 33 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,434,928
of 16,368,434 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,166
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,937
of 306,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,368,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.