↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nghia Nguyen, Bing Zhang, Stefan D Holubar, Darrell S Pardi, Siddharth Singh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 59 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 22%
Psychology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 64 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,095
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,423
of 476,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.