↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001176.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nghia Nguyen, Bing Zhang, Stefan D Holubar, Darrell S Pardi, Siddharth Singh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 61 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 68 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,010,915
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,784
of 12,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,311
of 461,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.