↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006048.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geir Smedslund, Therese K Dalsbø, Asbjørn Steiro, Aina Winsvold, Jocelyne Clench-Aas

Abstract

In national surveys between 10 % and 34 % of women have reported being physically assaulted by an intimate male partner. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or programmes with elements of CBT are frequently used treatments for physically abusive men. Participants either enroll voluntarily or are obliged to participate in CBT by means of a court order. CBT not only seeks to change behaviour using established behavioural strategies, but also targets the thinking patterns and beliefs that are thought to contribute to violence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 16%
Social Sciences 34 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 67 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,270,014
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,147
of 12,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,584
of 68,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.