↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006048.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geir Smedslund, Therese K Dalsbø, Asbjørn Steiro, Aina Winsvold, Jocelyne Clench-Aas

Abstract

In national surveys between 10 % and 34 % of women have reported being physically assaulted by an intimate male partner. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or programmes with elements of CBT are frequently used treatments for physically abusive men. Participants either enroll voluntarily or are obliged to participate in CBT by means of a court order. CBT not only seeks to change behaviour using established behavioural strategies, but also targets the thinking patterns and beliefs that are thought to contribute to violence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 18%
Social Sciences 32 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 41 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,056,419
of 18,925,022 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,303
of 11,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,113
of 142,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.