↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013057.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmood F Bhutta, Karen Head, Lee-Yee Chong, Jessica Daw, Anne Gm Schilder, Martin J Burton, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 78 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 86 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,440,050
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,039
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,101
of 432,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.