↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
285 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
Title
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meera Viswanathan, Leila Kahwati, Beate Jahn, Kayla Giger, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu, Christine Hill, Irma Klerings, Jana Meixner, Emma Persad, Birgit Teufer, Gerald Gartlehner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 13%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Other 26 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 132 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 142 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#92,820
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#171
of 12,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,933
of 411,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.