↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Universal screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
282 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
Title
Universal screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meera Viswanathan, Leila Kahwati, Beate Jahn, Kayla Giger, Andreea Iulia Dobrescu, Christine Hill, Irma Klerings, Jana Meixner, Emma Persad, Birgit Teufer, Gerald Gartlehner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 282 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 372 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 12%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Other 27 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 5%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 135 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 144 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#94,441
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#173
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,018
of 428,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.