↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay‐Goddard, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Leyda Thalman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 27%
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,388,494
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,676
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,984
of 121,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.