↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare P Herd, Claire L Tomlinson, Katherine HO Deane, Marian C Brady, Christina H Smith, Catherine M Sackley, Carl E Clarke

Abstract

Patients with Parkinson's disease commonly suffer from speech and voice difficulties such as impaired articulation and reduced loudness. Speech and language therapy (SLT) aims to improve the intelligibility of speech with behavioural treatment techniques or instrumental aids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 371 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 19%
Student > Bachelor 68 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 20 5%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 103 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 20%
Linguistics 18 5%
Psychology 18 5%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 106 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,996,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,607
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,028
of 186,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.