↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of speech and language therapy techniques for speech problems in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002814.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare P Herd, Claire L Tomlinson, Katherine HO Deane, Marian C Brady, Christina H Smith, Catherine M Sackley, Carl E Clarke

Abstract

Patients with Parkinson's disease commonly suffer from speech and voice difficulties such as impaired articulation and reduced loudness. Speech and language therapy (SLT) aims to improve the intelligibility of speech with behavioural treatment techniques or instrumental aids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 297 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 21%
Student > Bachelor 62 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Other 20 7%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 23%
Linguistics 17 6%
Psychology 17 6%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 59 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,962,290
of 19,141,800 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,522
of 11,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,716
of 142,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,141,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.