↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Phytomedicines (medicines derived from plants) for sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Phytomedicines (medicines derived from plants) for sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004448.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oluseyi Oniyangi, Damian H Cohall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 14 15%
Unspecified 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Unspecified 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 23 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,837,367
of 17,575,102 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,265
of 11,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,265
of 317,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,575,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.