↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
152 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012780.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Bajwah, Adejoke O Oluyase, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, Catherine J Evans, Gunn Grande, Chris Todd, Massimo Costantini, Fliss E Murtagh, Irene J Higginson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 44 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Psychology 11 7%
Unspecified 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 49 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#210,521
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#423
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,677
of 317,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.