↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003699.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakeshkumar S Shah, Arne Ohlsson, Jyotsna P Shah

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 32 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,618,073
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,111
of 11,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,433
of 318,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.