↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012575.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liana S Cahill, Leeanne M Carey, Natasha A Lannin, Megan Turville, Cheryl L Neilson, Elizabeth A Lynch, Carol E McKinstry, Jia Xi Han, Denise O'Connor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 243 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Unspecified 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 93 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 15%
Unspecified 23 9%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 100 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#776,657
of 23,963,877 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,567
of 12,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,517
of 418,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,963,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.