↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006194.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, James S Huntley, Rajan Madhok

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 246 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 60 24%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,427
of 77,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.