Report for: External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults

Title	External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults
Published in	Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI	10.1002/14651858.cd006194.pub2
Pubmed ID	17636832
Authors	Helen HG Handoll, James S Huntley, Rajan Madhok

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country	Count	As %
United States	2	<1%
Norway	1	<1%
Australia	1	<1%
Netherlands	1	<1%
New Zealand	1	<1%
India	1	<1%
China	1	<1%
Denmark	1	<1%
Unknown	225	96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	49	21%
Student > Bachelor	23	10%
Researcher	21	9%
Student > Postgraduate	21	9%
Student > Ph. D. Student	20	9%
Other	55	24%
Unknown	45	19%

Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	114	49%
Nursing and Health Professions	20	9%
Social Sciences	7	3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	6	3%
Engineering	5	2%
Other	21	9%
Unknown	61	26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.

All research outputs

#7,485,894

of 22,880,230 outputs

Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#8,962

of 12,329 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#24,497

of 67,684 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews

#48

of 76 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 12,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults

Mentioned by

Citations

Readers on

Mendeley readers

Geographical breakdown

Demographic breakdown

Attention Score in Context