↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Platinum-containing regimens for triple-negative metastatic breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Platinum-containing regimens for triple-negative metastatic breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam J Egger, Matthew Ming Ki Chan, Qingwei Luo, Nicholas Wilcken

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 28 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,733,803
of 19,957,201 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,463
of 12,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,192
of 390,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,957,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.