↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002125.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Melo, Ektoras X Georgiou, Neil Johnson, Sabine F. van Voorst, Annika Strandell, Ben Willem J Mol, Christian Becker, Ingrid E Granne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#892,069
of 17,986,329 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,272
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,301
of 385,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,986,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.