The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Electromechanical‐assisted training for walking after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006185.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Mehrholz, Simone Thomas, Joachim Kugler, Marcus Pohl, Bernhard Elsner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 572 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 7% |
| Researcher | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 110 | 19% |
| Unknown | 226 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 48 | 8% |
| Engineering | 38 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 9% |
| Unknown | 250 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#654,892
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,139
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,048
of 442,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.