↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003229.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Robin WM Vernooij, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Sonia Maria Uriona Tuma, Airton T Stein, Rosa Maria M Moreno Carriles, Emilio Vargas, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Unspecified 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 40 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,289,772
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,964
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,028
of 419,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.