The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Ivabradine as adjuvant treatment for chronic heart failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013004.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carina Benstoem, Christina Kalvelage, Thomas Breuer, Nicole Heussen, Gernot Marx, Christian Stoppe, Vincent Brandenburg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Japan | 2 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 72 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 74 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,196,046
of 26,150,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,437
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,095
of 444,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.